I hope scotus declares all the races where oversight was kicked out or where vote counting mysteriously stopped and counters kicked out for hours or even replaced simply invalid. Let’s redo those states with proper oversight, Arizona, Nevada, Michigan, Wisconsin and Washington State.
Anony Mous
JoinedPosts by Anony Mous
-
86
Voter Fraud !
by Sea Breeze indick morris sounds the alert:.
https://www.dickmorris.com/fight-massive-democratice-fraud/ .
-
-
-
131
Final Prediction on Election
by minimus inwho wins?
who loses?
president/ senate/ house of representatives .
-
-
Anony Mous
160,000 showed up out of no where in Michigan that were 80 to 90 percent all for Biden overnight. States having over 100% of registered voters showing up to vote.
Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer said, “I will not certify the vote in my state for Donald Trump, no matter the outcome.”Machines used at early voting polling centers in Russellville, Ark., were automatically counting ballots cast for President Donald Trump as votes for former Joe Biden.Just how many coincidences are there going to be? I'm expecting recounts in Wisconsin and Michigan, this isn't over yet for months.
-
131
Final Prediction on Election
by minimus inwho wins?
who loses?
president/ senate/ house of representatives .
-
-
Anony Mous
Election result right now is Trump up nearly 1M in PA, 100k in every other swing state, 300k in Michigan except Arizona where red areas haven’t been released yet. Democrat states like PA called a circuit breaker and stopped counting the vote until tomorrow and has extended votes to be allowed mailed until Friday, without postmark. As I said, Trump wins today, Democrats will cheat their way to victory.
Both Biden and Trump made a victory speech. The MSM (CNN, NBC) just cut the feed from Trump’s speech. Even though Biden and Trump made similar speeches and Twitter posts, Trump was blocked from Twitter and Facebook
Republicans held the Senate, Democrats the House but they lost 5 seats, my predictions were on point.
-
5
ARC and the Watchtower's no voting rule
by Listener inin australia it is compulsory to vote but none of the jws do vote or even turn up at the polling booth and lodge an invalid vote since they don't want to stumble anyone (the people they meet door knocking).
the government fines people for not voting unless they have a valid excuse.
the jws state that they are conscientious objects due to their religious beliefs.
-
-
Anony Mous
I wouldn't want a government forcing a vote from anyone, that just seems like a recipe for legitimizing a dictatorship.
I would wholeheartedly agree with the government taking religious status from the organization, but individual rights must be preserved.
-
131
Final Prediction on Election
by minimus inwho wins?
who loses?
president/ senate/ house of representatives .
-
-
Anony Mous
The left-wing media is already saying the voting is illegitimate as the USPS doesn't have the capacity to handle the mail-in votes, which they accurately warned about months ago. CNN now has a tally of every district where USPS has mailing delays with grave warnings that Biden may lose on account of the USPS.
-
131
Final Prediction on Election
by minimus inwho wins?
who loses?
president/ senate/ house of representatives .
-
-
Anony Mous
I think Trump will eke out a victory today, however Biden has already said he will sue everywhere (his campaign hired well over 300 law firms across the nation) and some left-wing Democrat states like Pennsylvania and Michigan have left the door wide open to fraud by allowing mail-in votes to be sent in well past the day of the election. Trump will win today, but he will lose tomorrow as votes are recounted, as Pelosi said last week "to count votes until Biden wins". This will probably go to SCOTUS in the end, although good for the country, Trump has not appointed any partisans, Kavanaugh and ACB are centrists so we will have to see about the arguments.
I think Republicans may take the Senate but won't take the House.
-
41
The 1950s NWT (1984)
by HowTheBibleWasCreated ini did a video on this subject once but feel this is a noteworthy topic.
to be honest the old nwt has come under sonsiderable attack from fundie morons attacking it's nt which was translated with a few revisals in 1950.the truth is john 1:1 and 8:58 and other texts, though despite being odd, are within the translation rules as are the inclusion of the word {other} since this was stated in the forward as an interpolation.
jehovah in the nt is odd but certianly lacking as other translations have added more yhwh.. so the ot?
-
-
Anony Mous
BeDuhn is a close WTBTS sympathizer if not outright a JW. There are exchanges on this forum from ~14 years ago that show that he distributed WTBTS literature such as the Kingdom Interlinear to his students as textbooks and that he is highly biased, claiming that every scholar that does not adhere to the WTBTS viewpoint is biased.
Even reviewers of his book outright state that he only accepts and defends the Jehovah's Witness viewpoints and thus his book is incredibly biased for anyone that does not accept those viewpoints while at the same time stating that HE alone in his field is not biased at all. You can't imagine the hubris that guy must have to claim he is infallible, if anything, it sounds like he may have been involved in the translation of the NWT himself (given the authors have never been revealed) and thus feels the need to defend it.
This is a quote from BeDuhn on EVERY other biblical scholar: I do not "ignore" these predecessors and colleagues, but rather find fault with their highly biased approach and surprisingly fallacious claims.
You can find a scholarly rebuttal to the BeDuhn books here and it isn't good for BeDuhn: https://web.archive.org/web/20110303223048/http://www.ses.edu:80/Portals/0/documents/TRUTH%20IN%20TRANSLATIONA%2001.pdf
Note that BeDuhn's appendix on the NWT use of Jehovah even where it isn't in ANY extant translation, BeDuhn's arguments are basically the same arguments which the WTBTS uses to justify the mistranslation. You could literally read his book and put earlier WT articles and see the arguments are a copy.
-
-
-
Anony Mous
@slimboyfat: All the countries that so-called did really well have these 3 things in common:
- They are remote countries that see fewer International travelers, Taiwan has sanctions imposed upon it from the mainland, you can't travel there without China and China doesn't let just anyone go there.
- Most of those countries are communist or extremely liberal (eg. New Zealand) and have imposed very strict restrictions upon its population before (guns, travel, taxes) and their population is used to heavy government regulation. Not only would no free country go along with these sorts of restrictions, they already have the deaths, low economic output and other issues associated with such regimes. Yes, even New Zealand.
You ask: What is wrong with our leaders that they can’t manage to do this? - I ask, what is wrong that their population allows their leaders to test, track and trace anyone against their will. Not only that, but as we see from Europe, if your population isn't hit yet, it will eventually get hit, but now with a stronger, mutated virus, there will be no immunity if everyone remains isolated across the globe. You can off course always put everyone in a sterile bubble at gunpoint, but that doesn't improve the economy.
The reality is that if you're younger than 40, this is less deadly than the flu, if you're between 40 and 65, it's as deadly as the flu, if you're older than 65, pretty much anything, including the flu has a better chance to end up killing you. Now we don't stop surgeries on people older than 65, we don't lock down or mask up every flu season. It burned through NY and many no-lockdown US states and Italy and Sweden, they don't see any resurgence in death. Belgium locked down fast and early, they've been having the top COVID deaths in the world (per capita).
-
41
The 1950s NWT (1984)
by HowTheBibleWasCreated ini did a video on this subject once but feel this is a noteworthy topic.
to be honest the old nwt has come under sonsiderable attack from fundie morons attacking it's nt which was translated with a few revisals in 1950.the truth is john 1:1 and 8:58 and other texts, though despite being odd, are within the translation rules as are the inclusion of the word {other} since this was stated in the forward as an interpolation.
jehovah in the nt is odd but certianly lacking as other translations have added more yhwh.. so the ot?
-
-
Anony Mous
Dr. Bruce Metzger, Professor of New Testament at Princeton Universtity:
“Far more pernicious in this same verse is the rendering… ‘and the Word was a god’… It must be stated quite frankly that, if the Jehovah’s Witnesses take this translation seriously, they are polytheists. In view of the additional light which is available during this age of Grace, such a representation is even more reprehensible than were the heathenish, polytheistic errors into which ancient Israel was so prone to fall. As a matter of solid fact, however, such a rendering is a frightful mistranslation.” (For the Record – John 1:1)
Dr. William Barclay, a leading Greek scholar, University of Glasgow, Scotland:
“The deliberate distortion of truth by this sect is seen in their New Testament translations, John 1:1 is translated: ‘the Word was a god,’ a translation which is grammatically impossible. It is abundantly clear that a sect that can translate the New Testament like that is intellectually dishonest.”
H. H. Rowley, British scholar:
“From beginning to end this volume is a shining example of how the Bible should NOT be translated.”
Dr. Julius Mantey, author of A Manual Grammar of the Greek New Testament:
“A grossly misleading translation”; “obsolete and incorrect“; “shocking mistranslation“
“It is neither scholarly nor reasonable to translate John 1:1 ‘the Word was a god.’ But of all the scholars in the world, so far as we know, none have translated this verse as Jehovah’s Witnesses have done.”
“I have never read any New Testament so badly translated as the Kingdom Interlinear of the Greek Scriptures…. It is a distortion–not a translation.”
“The translators of the New World Translation are ‘diabolical deceivers.'”
Dr. Edgar J. Goodspeed, well known translator:
“A fatal distortion of Biblical truth”; “the grammar is regrettable”
The one “bible” which translates John 1:1 as “the Word was a god” known to us, and to the WTB&TS, is Johannes Greber’s “Bible.”
Greber was a Catholic priest who became a spiritist. He claimed to get his “translation” as a medium of the spirit world.
He wrote another book entitled, Communication with the Spirit World, published in 1932, which details his experiences as a medium.
-
-
-
Anony Mous
There is a spike in cases, but not deaths. Basically, more people are getting it because people are getting sick and tired from being inside. Go to the supermarket and you'll see, people are close again, they aren't staying 6 feet away.